Does the Saying “Sell in May and Go Away” Stand Up to Scrutiny?

The adage “Sell in May and Go Away” is a well-known investment strategy that suggests investors should sell their stocks in May and re-enter the market in November, avoiding the traditionally weaker summer months. This strategy is based on historical market trends and patterns but does it hold up under scrutiny? Let’s delve into the concept, its origins, arguments for and against, and whether it’s a viable approach for today’s investors.

Origins and Basis of “Sell in May and Go Away”

The phrase is believed to originate from an old English saying, “Sell in May and go away, come back on St. Leger’s Day” (referring to a horse race in mid-September). The rationale behind this strategy is rooted in seasonal patterns and the belief that markets tend to underperform or experience heightened volatility during the summer months, particularly in Western markets where traders historically took vacations.

Arguments For “Sell in May and Go Away”

  1. Historical Performance: Backtesting shows that in some years, markets have indeed exhibited weaker performance from May to October compared to other periods.
  2. Behavioural Finance: The strategy aligns with behavioural finance principles, where investor sentiment and trading volumes may decrease during summer months, potentially impacting market liquidity and performance.
  3. Reduced Risk Exposure: Exiting the market in May and re-entering later could reduce exposure to potential summer volatility or geopolitical uncertainties that often arise during vacation periods.

Arguments Against “Sell in May and Go Away”

  1. Market Timing Challenges: Successfully timing the market consistently is difficult and investors risk missing out on potential gains if markets perform well during the summer months.
  2. Costs and Taxes: Frequent buying and selling can lead to higher transaction costs and tax implications, eroding overall returns.
  3. Changing Market Dynamics: Globalisation, technological advancements, and evolving market structures may diminish the reliability of historical patterns, making past performance less predictive of future outcomes.

Modern Interpretations and Considerations

  1. Data-Driven Analysis: Some studies suggest that while the strategy may have worked in the past, its efficacy in recent years has been mixed or even diminished due to changing market dynamics.
  2. Alternative Strategies: Investors may consider alternative strategies such as diversification, pound-cost averaging or focusing on long-term fundamentals rather than short-term seasonal trends.
  3. Personalised Approach: The suitability of “Sell in May and Go Away” depends on individual risk tolerance, investment goals, and time horizon. It may not be suitable for all investors and portfolios.

Conclusion

While “Sell in May and Go Away” has historical roots and intuitive appeal, its reliability as a standalone investment strategy is debatable. Market conditions, investor behaviour and global economic factors continue to evolve, challenging the predictability of seasonal patterns. Investors should approach seasonal strategies with caution, considering their personal circumstances and consulting with financial advisers to determine the most appropriate approach. Ultimately, a balanced and diversified investment strategy based on individual goals and risk tolerance is likely to provide more consistent and sustainable returns over the long term.  You know it makes sense.*

Tony Byrne, Managing Director

If you want to learn more about this topic, please find the link here.  

More information about our fund can be found here:  Hargreaves Lansdown or AJ Bell

Risk warnings

The value of investments and the income derived from them may fall as well as rise. You may not get back what you invest. This communication is for general information only and is not intended to be individual advice. You are recommended to seek competent professional advice before taking any action. All statements concerning the tax treatment of products and their benefits are based on our understanding of current tax law and HM Revenue and Customs practice. Levels and bases of tax relief are subject to change. This blog is based on my own observations and opinions.

You will also like:

Newsletter

Subscribe to our weekly blogs and newsletters

Directly to your inbox.

Minerva Money Management - Newsletter

The Seven Themes Of The Future

Disclosure of Holdings

We are transparent and here is the full disclosure of our holdings. For the most up to date documents Click Here

GAMES WORKSHOP GROUP PLC

AMAZON.COM INC

COMPUTER MODELL

NVIDIA CORP

KLA CORP

NOVA MEASURING

MICROSOFT CORP

NOVO-NORDISK-ADR

JUVENESCENCE LTD

BECKLEY PSYTECH LIMITED

CHAPTERS GROUP AG

CONSTELLATION SO

MERCADOLIBRE INC

WISDOMTREE PHYSICAL GOLD

FORTINET INC

ASML HOLDING-NY

MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC

ARISTA NETWORKS INC

WISE PLC – A

ASHTEAD TECHNOLO

BITMINE IMMERSIO

CONSTELLATION-40

SHOPIFY INC – CLASS A

ALPHABET INC-CL A

PAYPAL HOLDINGS INC

BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC